Stay updated with Kautilya's blog, featuring articles on education trends, career advice, and personal growth strategies. Unlock your potential now.

Latest Featuring Articles | Kautilya School of Public Policy

Climate change is one of the biggest collective action problems the world has ever faced. Despite growing agreement that the negative effects of climate change are real and are fast approaching, the policy efforts are yet to effectively tackle the issue. The most popular answer to the question why global warming and climate change is such a difficult problem to solve is that the issue has the characteristics of a <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730">wicked problem</a>. However, the popularity of this rhetoric often shifts attention away from limitations of the decision-making process itself. A closer look at the policymaking process reveals that when faced with issues like climate change which are riddled with ambiguity and uncertainty, the decisionmakers tend to end up with non-optimal policy choices. This points towards inherent limitations in the decision-making process.&nbsp;

Any attempt to understand why global efforts to solve climate change remains in an impasse should also enquire into how decisionmakers make judgments and decisions when faced with uncertainty. The seminal work of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky on heuristics and biases offers an interesting framework that could be applied in this respect. According to <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/1738360">Tversky and Kahneman (1974)</a>, individuals tend to rely on heuristics or mental shortcuts to reduce complex decisions to simpler judgmental operations. Three such key heuristics are representativeness heuristic, availability heuristic and adjustments and anchoring. However, when faced with uncertainty, these heuristics could cloud the judgment and lead to erroneous decisions.&nbsp;

Representativeness heuristic refers to the situation where the degree of resemblance guides probability evaluation in decision-making. When encountered with situation A, its resemblance to situation B leads the decisionmaker to base the judgments on stereotypes about B. In climate change policy, this occurs due to the tendency to treat global warming as a typical environmental problem (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975714">Victor,2011</a>). The solution to environmental problems typically involves small technological shifts and simple regulatory policies. This does not work in case of the greenhouse gas emissions issue, which is fundamentally a global, inter-temporal problem with extreme uncertainty about the effects on both the economy and environment. Identifying the global warming issue as an environmental issue also means that there is an immediate tendency to apply solutions that have worked in case of environmental problems. This is also a problem of identification (<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/3525655">Jones, 2003</a>) in which people identify readily with previous solutions. One major example in this respect is the influence of ozone regulation efforts. As the ozone regulation efforts were largely successful, there is an inherent tendency to rely on the same set of strategies ignoring the fact that the problem at hand is different and situations have evolved. The situation also leads to an &lsquo;illusion of validity&rsquo; (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974). Armed with a high degree of representativeness, the decisionmakers have more confidence in their capacity to predict outcomes. This, in turn, leads to stronger adherence to current frameworks and reluctance to look for alternative solutions that might be better suited to the issue.

The second heuristic that Tversky and Kahneman talk about is the availability heuristic which refers to the tendency of people to base their judgments on instances or events that immediately comes to mind. For example, a policy actor with personal experience of a climate disaster tends to approach and present the problem very differently. Similarly, a government might interpret climate risks differently after being faced with a natural disaster. Even if the association of the extreme event with climate change is negligible, they might give more weightage to these low-probability events. The &lsquo;biases of imaginability&rsquo; play a key role in the evaluation of probabilities (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974). While the ease of imagination tends to overestimate the probability, the lack of immediate experience can lead to underestimation of the risks. The myopic response of climate deniers in less affected developed countries has to be understood in this context. The availability heuristic also explains why certain highly visible policy interventions receive disproportionate attention over other interventions which may be more effective but less visible and less cognitively accessible.&nbsp;

The third heuristic adjustments and anchoring occur when estimations start from an initial value (or an anchor) that is adjusted to yield the final answer. In other words, the starting point is already given, and adjustments are made (often insufficiently) based on this anchor. This bias creeps into climate change in multiple ways. One route is through the initial positions assumed by governments or decision makers. For example, at the international level, current positions assumed by many countries continue to be tied to their historical positions that were framed when the problem was initially conceived at the international stage. Though some might be consciously using it as a negotiating tactic, generally this has led to an anchoring effect in climate change platforms causing insufficient adjustments by involved parties. Similarly, despite the repeated failure to ensure compliance and enforce binding agreements, the UN-led architecture remains the dominant regime on which international climate policy efforts are anchored. This could be a reason why calls for shifting regulatory efforts to smaller influential groups are yet to gain traction in the international climate regime. The policy stasis commonly observed with respect to emission targets, threshold values, cost estimations etc. can also be attributed to anchoring effect.&nbsp; Once a particular figure gains widespread traction, subsequent revisions tend to be incremental if not completely ignored.&nbsp;

In the policy world riddled with uncertainty, complex decisions are inevitable. Policy makers have not much option but to rely on their heuristics from time to time. The way forward is not to abandon them altogether but to be better aware about the biases and systematic errors they lead us into.&nbsp;

Costly Shortcuts: The Mental Traps in Climate Policy

I like to travel, however, my work has always kept me in and around Hyderabad. I had begun to identify travel as an idea versus an experience. I was born and raised in Hyderabad, so everything outside of the city was unexplored. The opportunity to travel with my team from work changed this. My workplace sent me to Dandeli and Gokarna.I was finally going to see what it was like to leave Hyderabad and see what was waiting for me outside of my comfort zone. Something about leaving Hyderabad felt right, even if it was just for a work trip. For the first time, I was experiencing what it meant to leave something familiar behind. Starting anything is always going to be the <a href="https://medium.com/swlh/why-starting-is-the-hardest-part-and-how-to-overcome-it-ab87f5d1b577">hardest part</a>. This was no different. From the waiting area of the bus station to sitting in the bus that had Hyderabad in its rear-view mirror, I was able to get to know my coworkers in a different way. It felt natural. People I knew in a professional capacity became people with a personality that I could engage with. The path itself was an important part of the trip.At work, people are normally known by their responsibilities and titles. But outside of the office, they are not as important. A journey becomes a different kind of place, a place where all one does is chat, laugh, eat, tell stories, and spend some time.

Dandeli and Gokarna 
Dandeli taught me something new about<a href="https://medium.com/@mridulabhutda/travel-diaries-dandeli-india-5913719a7b8e"> travel</a>. The greenery, openness, and proximity to nature made me feel a distance from my daily surroundings. It helped me understand that at times we need to get away from our surroundings to know what the world has in store for us. From Dandeli, I made a trip to Gokarna, and the ambience totally transformed. Forests and adventure were replaced by beaches, waves, skies, and silence. Standing next to the sea made me think that sometimes travel is not only about reaching another tourist destination. Sitting there and chatting or just observing waves can make the trip unforgettable.

Beyond Language 
The next lesson I learned from my travels involved the differences that I observed, especially concerning <a href="https://airapps.co/blog/how-to-handle-language-differences-when-traveling-internationally">language</a> and communications. Sometimes, language is not enough for communication. However, communication proceeds. A smile, a gesture, being patient, or just trying to understand the other person is able to remove barriers even where language fails. Travel brings out the differences, but travel shows us something else too. Underneath different languages, traditions and cultures, different lifestyles of the people we meet, there are still many things that we share as human beings. These include curiosity, kindness, laughter, and communion that need no translation. 
&nbsp;

More than Colleagues 
Undoubtedly, the most important thing I discovered about my colleagues through this journey was how much more than just colleagues they are. Apart from all of the work-related activities, I had the opportunity to learn people and understand them better. Communicating on a more personal level, laughing, and having fun together helped me understand that travelling together creates a bond that is not necessarily created at a workplace. You might start your journey as a group of colleagues, but somehow you return as friends.

What I Have Brought Back 
Everything felt familiar when I came back to Hyderabad, but I was no longer the same person that I had been when I left. I came back carrying with me memories of Dandeli, the serene shores of Gokarna, conversations along the way, new acquaintances, and more appreciation of the world around me than before. My first venture out of Hyderabad opened up a whole new understanding to me that travelling is not just about places, but also about people, experiences, differences, conversations and viewpoints. Hyderabad is where my trip started, Dandeli provided me with an adventure, Gokarna with serenity, and the road in between them provided me with memories. My trip might have begun with this particular trip, but my travels do not end here. Sometimes you leave your familiar world to see the world, only to come back and find a little more of yourself in the process.

Beyond Hyderabad: The Journey That Changed My Perspective

Generative artificial intelligence has become one of the leading usages of artificial intelligence systems by a larger base of audience. While there are already enough instances to highlight the use of GenAI across the education or art sector, it is no longer a distant vision of seeing its usage in governance systems. There have already been documented instances of <a href="https://www.knkx.org/government/2025-08-26/washington-city-officials-chatgpt-write-government-documents-artificial-intelligence">usage</a> of popular platforms such as ChatGPT by Washington City officials and their <a href="https://fortune.com/2025/10/07/deloitte-ai-australia-government-report-hallucinations-technology-290000-refund/">use</a> by private consultants such as Deloitte. The problem is not very far away from India either as studies have <a href="https://aman.bh/blog/2025/ai-text-in-indian-government-documents">highlighted</a> the use of AI generated text in government documents. While the IT ministry has already brought in rules for photorealistic synthetic media (Deep, 2026), we are hence not far away from the labeling of AI generated text, something that is discussed in the given scenario.

The use of the AI system to summarize research and to generate policy language is a classic example of the use of economics of cheap generation, which <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/12LhDH1PgRdGzPt1kLalgGVzSBPcKw65RHZruELnB5GM/edit?tab=t.0">reduces</a> the cost of generation, but doesn&#39;t increase the verification capacity, hence causing the governance problem of a verification bottleneck.

The economics of cheap generation is the primary economic mechanism over here. With the use of the Generative AI systems in the pilot project, it is seen that while there might be an initial capital cost of setting up such GenAI tools, after the initial cost, the marginal cost that is the cost of generating additional information, approaches a near-zero value. As there is little cost of usage of GenAI tools after their creation, this effectively means tasks such as summarizing academic research, generating draft policy briefs and recommending regulatory languages, all of which was done by government officials previously, can be done at virtually no extra cost, and at a significantly lower time because of the new tools. All of the aforementioned tasks which would require human input and potential cost of hiring such human labor is no longer relevant as the GenAI tools can do it at a much cheaper price. Hence, the cost of <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586">generating</a> content itself is very cheap, and the mechanism is of cheap generation.

It must be highlighted that one could also see delegated execution as another economic mechanism over here. It must be highlighted that summarizing research and drafting are largely in the domain of generative content, hence, it cannot be the primary, but rather only a secondary economic mechanism, and beyond the ambit of this policy brief.

In the absence of cheap generation, the initial governance problem was that of producing information or producing the governance drafts, or having to go through academic research. Now, with the advent of GenAI and the economics of cheap generation, the essential governance problem <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/12LhDH1PgRdGzPt1kLalgGVzSBPcKw65RHZruELnB5GM/edit?tab=t.0">shifts</a> from producing information to verifying the information. Initially, the cost of production of information was typically high as it would require detailed research and writing skills, which require comprehensive training and would require a few trained professionals to do the same. With the advent of cheap generation, the cost of information production has gone significantly down, enabling organizations to produce information at the humungous scale that was not envisioned before. While the cost as well as the scale of generation has changed, the capacity of the organization to verify the generated content has not necessarily changed. Initially, there was some congruence between the generated output and the verification capacity. Now, as the generated output has exponentially increased, the verification has become scarce, and the capacity is insufficient, hence <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922">causing</a> a verification bottleneck.&nbsp;

Hence, the question now is, who verifies these automated outputs? How can the verification capacity be increased? Could AI even be trusted with the verification of content that it itself has generated, with flaws in it as seen in the given case study. There is also a philosophical problem of epistemic externalities, particularly as cabinet notes and other decision-making instruments, if they are victim to the GenAI hallucination, then it can significantly <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/12LhDH1PgRdGzPt1kLalgGVzSBPcKw65RHZruELnB5GM/edit?tab=t.0">erode</a> the quality of decision environments, and subsequently, the decision itself.

For such complex problems, the use of Hood&#39;s <a href="https://archive.org/details/toolsofgovernmen0000hood_d0a8">NATO framework</a> provides guidance on designing policy instruments. The use of nodality or information based tools is particularly suitable in the given case. The proposed tool is to ensure that the GenAI tool in itself is built on government documents and government data and only provides content that is developed from this data. Only a government approved database of research papers can be a part of this training data set. This ensures that the risk of hallucination is lower in the tool. Complimentary to this, there must be a proper audit requirement, which must not be restricted to the algorithm, but to the usage as a whole, <a href="https://www.jkroll.com/papers/dissertation.pdf">requiring</a> labeling of content as AI-generated.

The basic mechanism is that of having auditing requirements. By restricting the database of the GenAI tool, the organization ensures that there would be lesser chances of hallucination, and reduces any potential information asymmetry. It brings about the need for verification, or usage of discretion before processing the given information. To illustrate, the problems of ghost citations or references to laws that don&#39;t exist will be infrequent occurrence as the data on which the GenAI tool primarily works would be an accurate data set, hence moving the verification requirement to ex ante instead of post generation. The auditing requirement of flagging the content highlights that for data of lower priority, such as internal notes, the requirement for verification could be lower, while high priority sensitive content, such as the cabinet notes would have a higher requirement for verifications. Hence, the limited verification capacity is matched as per the priority of verification. verification requirement. Essentially, the tool ensures that limited verification capacity is distributed as per priority of need.

GenAI in Government Policy Drafting: From Production to Verification

One of the biggest challenges in studying China is that Beijing rarely announces its intentions clearly. In the People&rsquo;s Liberation Army, promotions depend on loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), unlike most countries where they are based mainly on professional achievements. Promotions in the Xi era show who President Xi trusts, what capabilities he values, and the direction of the PLA. They signal China&rsquo;s strategic intentions in the military domain and, by extension, the security environment that India must prepare itself for.

On July 3, 2026, China&rsquo;s Central Military Commission (CMC) held its first promotion ceremony of the year, promoting senior officers to the rank of general. The promotions are particularly remarkable given the scrutiny the CMC has faced following the anti-corruption campaign of the CCP&rsquo;s Central Commission for Discipline Inspection.

Notably, Zhang Shuguang, secretary of the CMC Discipline Inspection Commission (CMCCDI) and director of the CMC Commission of Supervision, and Wang Gang, commander of the PLA Air Force (PLAAF), were <a href="http://en.cppcc.gov.cn/2026-07/06/c_1195306.htm">promoted</a> to the general rank, sparking speculation about a reshuffling in the CMC next year. As the 21st Party Congress approaches, these promotions deserve close attention.

When Xi Jinping assumed office as General Secretary of the CCP in 2012, the anti-corruption campaign was launched to target corrupt officials across the Party and the PLA. Rather than losing momentum over time, it dismantled numerous political and military factions. By 2017, CMC&rsquo;s membership shrunk from eleven members to just <a href="https://www.indiatoday.in/india-today-insight/story/how-chinas-military-is-hit-by-biggest-purge-in-decades-2943331-2026-07-08">seven</a>. Many analysts concluded that Xi had successfully consolidated control over the military.

The wave of purges and personnel changes subsided after 2017, and the CMC and the PLA became relatively stable by 2021. However, a fresh round of dismissals began in 2022, triggering renewed speculation in Beijing. Beginning in 2022, the CCP launched what can be called &ldquo;Phase Two&rdquo; of Xi&rsquo;s anti-corruption <a href="https://orcasia.org/anti-corruption-campaigns-in-china">campaign</a>, signaling that the effort to reshape China&rsquo;s military and political elite was ongoing.

This raises more important questions. What do these promotions reveal about Xi Jinping&rsquo;s military reforms? Most importantly, what are the implications for India&rsquo;s strategic environment?

The CMC is the top command of China&rsquo;s military and currently consists of only two members: Xi Jinping as chairman and General Zhang Shengmin as vice chairman. Over the past two years, five CMC members were removed. <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-67207353">Li Shangfu</a> was fired in 2023, followed by He <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-expels-two-top-generals-communist-party-anti-corruption-purge-2025-10-17/">Weidong</a> and Miao Hua in 2025, and Zhang <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8d0l0g8yz5o">Youxia</a> and Liu Zhenli earlier this year. The rapid restructuring has prompted questions about the future composition of the CMC

While Zhang Shengmin remains on the CMC, he has been <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-03/xi-replaces-anti-corruption-leader-in-purge-of-china-s-army">succeeded </a>as Secretary of the CMCCDI by General Zhang Shuguang. Although this does not automatically entail CMC membership, his eventual appointment would make him the second CMCCDI secretary to serve on the CMC, underscoring CMCCDI&rsquo;s growing importance in Beijing&rsquo;s military and political strategy.

&nbsp;

However, the promotion of Wang Gang is of particular interest to us Indians.

For the first time in decades, China has a strong opportunity to convert its qualitative edge over India into regional strategic advantage. The long-standing Sino-India border dispute spans nearly 3,500 kilometers, although most of it is impassable by the Himalayas. Even the 1962 Sino-India War broke out over the contested Aksai Chin region, surrounded by extremely rugged terrain. While the natural barriers contributed to the outcome of the war, they also impacted the nature of the fighting. More specifically, waging war in such conditions was logistically challenging, with both nations constrained by the local geography. Air superiority was paramount, although impossible for either nation to achieve given the limitations of their air power at the time.

Over six decades later, air power has become central to the prospects of renewed conflict. It is only logical to assume that air superiority will be decisive in any future Sino-India conflict. The promotion of Wang Gang is another sign that President Xi is determined to accelerate PLA modernization, with air power at the center of his vision.

Since 2015, Xi&rsquo;s <a href="https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/an-analysis-of-chinese-military-reform-towards-the-us-model/">military reforms</a> have altered the PLA&rsquo;s organizational structure. New institutions for aerospace, cyber operations, information support, and logistics now provide centralized functions across all military branches, allowing the PLAAF to operate within an integrated system. In contrast, India&rsquo;s military infrastructure remains comparatively more siloed.

For India, this represents a critical challenge, as competition between the two regional powers will take place not only on the contested border but also in the skies above it. The Indian Air Force ranks among the world&rsquo;s finest <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/iaf-more-powerful-than-chinas-air-force-retains-worlds-no-3-rank-for-fifth-consecutive-year-wdmma/articleshow/132354673.cms?from=mdr">fighting</a> forces and possesses valuable operational experience. However, China enjoys advantages in size, domestic production, and industrial capacity. At present, India&rsquo;s defense industry relies on a combination of foreign suppliers and indigenous producers, whereas China has gradually increased its domestic production through state-owned companies.

In this context, the promotion of Wang Gang may represent the next step in the long-planned expansion of China&rsquo;s aerospace capabilities. With continued investment in aviation and network-centric capabilities, the PLAAF will be capable of projecting power deep into the Indian border areas. Thus, Wang&rsquo;s promotion has far-reaching implications for India&rsquo;s strategic military planning.&nbsp;

The implications for India extend beyond military competition. As China&rsquo;s military seeks to reduce geographical limitations through integrated structures, India&rsquo;s strategic planning must also account for an operational environment where air superiority could be just as important as territorial control.

Military promotions in China rarely serve only a ceremonial function. For Xi Jinping, each promotion is a key pillar in his strategy of transforming both the CCP and the PLA into truly formidable organizations. In turn, the appointments of General Zhang Shuguang and Wang Gang highlight the two aspects of this strategy, namely, China&rsquo;s political and military modernization. For India, such developments must always be regarded as matters of strategic significance, as they provide useful insights into the future intentions of China&rsquo;s military authorities.

As Beijing reshapes the relationship between political power, military organization, and future warfare, India&rsquo;s strategic community must focus on changes in China&rsquo;s military leadership as much as on advancements in its military equipment.

New Faces, New Priorities? Reading Xi Jinping's Military Promotions

In April 2026, a video showing hundreds of workers at a garment factory in Gurugram went <a href="https://scroll.in/article/1092960/how-big-tech-is-harnessing-the-data-of-indian-factory-workers-to-train-robots">viral</a>. Seated at their sewing machines, with head-mounted cameras, workers laboured on. The cameras recorded every stitch, finger calibration and hand <a href="https://www.theindiaforum.in/economy/ai-needs-human-hands-indian-workers-resist">movement</a>. Some of them work twelve-hour shifts, six days a week, with little or no extra pay for the first-person footage of the tasks that define their work.&ldquo;They are recording our work to prepare and train a robot, which is making us worried&hellip;it will mean job losses,&rdquo; said <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/indias-workers-train-ai-that-may-replace-them/video-77940078">Ravi</a> Kumar, a factory worker from Delhi. Another worker from Nagpur stated, &ldquo;I&rsquo;m <a href="https://indianexpress.com/article/business/workers-india-training-robots-replace-factory-10698712/">working</a> in my own grave.&rdquo;

Real human labour, contributing to large behaviour models (LBMs) and helping train AI-powered humanoid robots that could one day <a href="https://growjustindia.com/national/the-ai-eye-why-indian-workers-are-training-their-robot-replacements-33338">replace </a>them. This is not a one-off occurrence but a lived reality for thousands of blue-collar workers across India. Investigative reports conducted by <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jun/24/indian-factory-workers-told-film-themselves-for-ai-robots">The Guardian</a>, <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/indias-workers-train-ai-that-may-replace-them/video-77940078">DW</a>, and <a href="https://indianexpress.com/article/business/workers-india-training-robots-replace-factory-10698712/">the Indian Express</a> highlight at least five states where the daily routines of workers are captured from factory floors. Workers from Delhi, Gurugram, Nagpur, Bengaluru, and Chennai are all contributors to an ever-growing pool of egocentric data. Data, critical for creating LBMs and developing humanoids.

The prize?

A market size of an astronomic 5 trillion dollars for humanoids by 2050, according to one <a href="https://www.morganstanley.com/insights/articles/humanoid-robot-market-5-trillion-by-2050">Morgan</a> Stanley report.&nbsp; One billion humanoid robots could be in use by 2050. Most importantly, one could avail it for as low as $15,000 by 2050. However, terms and conditions apply. The technology must advance at an accelerated pace, production volumes must increase, and supply chains should be predominantly <a href="https://www.morganstanley.com/insights/articles/humanoid-robot-market-5-trillion-by-2050">Chinese</a>.

The costs?&nbsp;

Several, but in this particular scenario, physical labour, the intellectual <a href="https://growjustindia.com/national/the-ai-eye-why-indian-workers-are-training-their-robot-replacements-33338">property</a> of informal workers, privacy, consent, collective harm and possible <a href="https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/looking-through-their-eyes-egocentric-data-collection-in-india">job loss</a>.&nbsp; Added costs include constant replacement anxiety, fears of workplace <a href="https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/looking-through-their-eyes-egocentric-data-collection-in-india">surveillance</a>, and extreme pressure from real-time <a href="https://growjustindia.com/national/the-ai-eye-why-indian-workers-are-training-their-robot-replacements-33338">monitoring</a>.

All of this, however, begs one simple policy question.&nbsp;

Is the direction of technology a choice?&nbsp;

Nobel laureates Daron Acemoglu and Simon <a href="https://shapingwork.mit.edu/research/power-and-progress-our-1000-year-struggle-over-technology-and-prosperity/">Johnson</a> stipulate that, &quot;Better technology offers the potential of better lives for many people, but only if it creates sufficient new tasks requiring human expertise and workers have enough power to demand a matching increase in compensation.&rdquo;&nbsp;

In their book, <a href="https://samataindia.org.in/data/books/Power-and-Progress-Our-Thousand-Year-Struggle-Over-Technology-and-Prosperity-(Daron-Acemoglu-Simon-Johnson)-(Z-Library).pdf">Power and Progress</a>: Our Thousand-Year Struggle over Technology and Prosperity, the writers highlight that throughout history, there have been several episodes of technological progress that produced &ldquo;<a href="https://samataindia.org.in/data/books/Power-and-Progress-Our-Thousand-Year-Struggle-Over-Technology-and-Prosperity-(Daron-Acemoglu-Simon-Johnson)-(Z-Library).pdf">no improvements&rdquo;</a> and led to &ldquo;even significant deterioration&rdquo;. According to them, if the market were to be left to its own devices, it would deliver great wealth to <a href="https://samataindia.org.in/data/books/Power-and-Progress-Our-Thousand-Year-Struggle-Over-Technology-and-Prosperity-(Daron-Acemoglu-Simon-Johnson)-(Z-Library).pdf">aggressive</a> investors and executives and leave out the rest.

In the past four and a half decades, much of the <a href="https://shapingwork.mit.edu/research/power-and-progress-our-1000-year-struggle-over-technology-and-prosperity/">industrial </a>world and the US have witnessed rising earning inequality, stagnation in earnings among <a href="https://shapingwork.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Acemoglu_Johnson_April-2024.pdf">non-college workers</a>, and an ever-shrinking share of labour in the national income. Data from the manufacturing sector, reflecting both US and global trends, show the precipitous drop in labour&rsquo;s share of value added from <a href="https://penguinrandomhouselibrary.com/book/?isbn=9798217182169">74 per cent </a>in 1981 to 46 per cent in 2016. A comparable contraction, though less severe, has been observed in the share of labour in national income both <a href="https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w32872/w32872.pdf#page=4.04">globally</a> and in the US.&nbsp;

According to Acemoglu, Johnson and David Autor, if the current tech sector efforts on &ldquo;even more automation&rdquo; hold, the pain for workers <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">&ldquo;will be magnified&quot;.</a> They caution, &quot;Really <a href="https://shapingwork.mit.edu/research/power-and-progress-our-1000-year-struggle-over-technology-and-prosperity/">bad</a> outcomes are possible when deluded technology leaders are able to impose their messianic visions on society.&rdquo;

The direction of technology is a choice. Striking a balance between automation and technologies that create new tasks is critical not only for stable wages and job creation but also for managing the cascading web of social consequences and <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">economic</a> disruptions it can trigger.

&ldquo;Pro-worker <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">Artificial Intelligence</a> (AI)&rdquo; and technologies &quot;that make human skills and expertise more valuable by expanding worker capabilities&quot; can provide a framework for intervention.&nbsp;

What is pro-worker AI?

By acting as a catalyst for new task creation, &ldquo;Pro-worker AI&rdquo; cultivates demand for novel manual proficiency. Consequently, such an approach can mitigate the <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">wicked</a> social challenges posed by job loss, rising inequality, and premature mortality.

Pro-worker AI acts as a force multiplier by combining human skills with technical expertise. They can enable workers to carry out &ldquo;more <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">sophisticated</a> tasks related to their jobs&rdquo;, &ldquo;tackle new tasks&rdquo; and also &ldquo;acquire new expertise&rdquo;. AI&rsquo;s ability to learn from examples by harnessing knowledge from unstructured information makes it a critical tool for augmenting worker capabilities.&nbsp;

Technologies are generally classified under five expansive and economically discrete categories as provided by <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">Acemoglu</a>, Autor and Johnson (2026). They can be labour-augmenting, capital-augmenting, automation-orientated, expertise-levellers or new-task creators. &ldquo;New task-creating technologies&rdquo; are <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">unambiguously</a> good for workers. They have the potential to expand what humans can do by creating entirely new tasks that did not exist a generation earlier, thus generating a demand for novel human expertise.&nbsp;

History offers a parallel precedent for pro-worker technologies. In the 19th century, as the industrial <a href="https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/2079/pba167p199_0.pdf">revolution</a> lowered labour share in the textile industry, the impact of automation was counterbalanced by expanding roles in manufacturing, railways, clerical and accounting roles. This trajectory manifested once more during the four decades post-World War II.

Pro-Worker AI in Practice

The <a href="https://www.se.com/my/en/work/support/myschneider-app/myschneider-electrician-app/">&ldquo;electrician&rsquo;s assistant (EA)&quot;</a> is a tangible example of <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-financial-page/can-ai-be-pro-worker">pro-worker AI.</a> The tool leverages the expertise of electricians while providing real-time assistance from a large language model. By working collaboratively with the technician, it ensures efficiency with reliability, simultaneously allowing them to accomplish more challenging tasks. The tool not only increases the effective supply of workers but also boosts technical proficiency, meeting the definition of pro-worker AI.

<a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">&ldquo;Teacher&rsquo;s AI-aid&quot;</a> is another example of pro-worker AI. The support tool, trained on curriculum material, student preferences and real-time inputs from the class, can work collaboratively with the educator. Such collaborative paradigms can be extended to support workers in different domains like construction, plumbing, healthcare, team leadership, training and supervision.&nbsp;

However, despite its obvious potential for good, pro-worker AI has not been a mainstream phenomenon. <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">This is largely driven by</a>, first, the commitment to the overarching ideological vision of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and, most critically, market failures for firms deploying AI as well as its developers.

The Way Forward

Moving towards pro-worker AI calls for a recalibration of the pro-automation and pro-AGI mindset that currently dominates the tech market. <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">Acemoglu, Autor and Johnson,</a>&nbsp; through their research, provide policy levers that can significantly shift the needle towards pro-worker AI. Within India&rsquo;s blue-collar workers in the textile sector, two become absolutely critical.&nbsp;

<a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">Discouraging</a> the theft of expertise by firms that use their own employees to train AI models through legal frameworks and amplifying the perspective of these workers through institutional mechanisms will help prevent a future that is inherently anti-worker.&nbsp;

Imposing limits on a firm&rsquo;s ability to harvest their employee&rsquo;s human expertise, by providing workers a <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">decisive</a> say over how their data is used, will help limit the commodification of human knowledge.&nbsp;

Finally, at the <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2026-03/Building%20Pro-Worker%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf">institutional</a> level, civil society organisations, especially labour unions, should champion voices of frontline workers and advocate for protective strategies at the local, state and central levels.

Striking a balance between automation and collaboration, coupling human judgement and AI capabilities will be critical as the technology matures.&nbsp;

Pro-Worker Artificial Intelligence: Reshaping the Direction of Technology

When we think about social status, we tend to focus on the things that people own and eventually on the money they spend: a luxury car, grand villa, designer clothing or even an extravagant wedding. Economists have largely reinforced this view, studying how people use <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ijcs.12852">consumption</a> to signal status, success or their place in the social hierarchy.&nbsp;

But is status really just about money?

<a href="https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/political-science/social-status-and-social-interaction">Social status</a> essentially refers to the position an individual or a household occupies within a social hierarchy. Some aspects of these positions are ascribed, i.e., we inherit them at birth. The family that we are born into, our caste, gender, religion, etc., shapes how society perceives us well before we make our own choices. There are other aspects that are achieved through personal effort, such as education, occupation, and income, which can alter our status throughout our lives. Together, these shape not only our opportunities but also the expectations placed upon us. Yet what we often fail to see is that status is rarely static. Whether inherited or achieved, social status has to be<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053535798800048"> maintained</a>. Relationships must be nurtured, social obligations fulfilled and one&rsquo;s own place in the community continually reaffirmed. Simply put, status is not just something we have, but constantly reproduce through our everyday lives.

This leads to another question: if status is something we maintain, what exactly do we invest in to maintain it?

Money is, of course, one answer. Thorstein Veblen&rsquo;s famous idea of <a href="https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=T3AAptSW8hkC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PT5&amp;dq=veblen+conspicuous+consumption&amp;ots=5q8717wHgA&amp;sig=uFvvCMrAkc-ZSZCc3JR1RFLlCM8&amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;q=veblen%20conspicuous%20consumption&amp;f=false">conspicuous consumption</a> argued that people often consume not only for utility but also to showcase their wealth and social standing. Since then, status has been observed through visible forms of expenditure communication, showing who we are or who we want to be. But this is only a part of the story. Imagine a family travelling for hours to attend a wedding, or neighbours who put their time into organising local events; these do not generate direct income, but people still do it. Why?&nbsp; None of these activities generates income, yet they require so much planning, commitment and above all, time.

Time, unlike money, is a resource every person possesses in equal measure. Every day offers twenty-four hours, no more and no less. But the way we spend those hours is anything but equal. Maybe these activities are doing something that we rarely pay attention to. They are not merely moments of leisure or recreation. They help build relationships, reinforce trust, maintain community ties, and demonstrate continued participation in a <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506342">shared</a> social world. They are investments not of money, but of time.

Feminist scholar Hanna Papanek referred to this idea as <a href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/493663">status production</a>. Rather than focusing on how people display status, status production asks how households actively create and sustain it. The emphasis shifts from visible consumption to the everyday practices that maintain a family&#39;s social standing. Attending community gatherings, participating in cultural events, maintaining kinship networks, or engaging in religious life are not always simply personal choices or hobbies. They can also be ways of fulfilling social expectations and reaffirming one&#39;s place within a community.

This distinction between status signalling and status production is subtle but important. Buying an expensive car may communicate wealth. Maintaining community relationships communicates reliability, belonging, commitment, or respectability. Both shape social standing, but they do so through very different means.

Looking at status through the lens of time also broadens our understanding of inequality. Not everyone has the same freedom to invest their time in maintaining social relationships. Paid work,<a href="https://www.emerald.com/ijse/article-pdf/50/7/969/1392725/ijse-03-2022-0164.pdf"> caregiving responsibilities</a>, <a href="https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2014/12/unpaid-care-work-the-missing-link-in-the-analysis-of-gender-gaps-in-labour-outcomes_d26d4043/1f3fd03f-en.pdf">household labour</a>, and other obligations all compete for the same twenty-four hours. The ability to participate in community life is therefore not simply a matter of personal preference; it is shaped by the social and economic constraints people face. Time itself becomes an unequally available resource.

This perspective also encourages us to rethink activities that are often dismissed as &quot;non-economic.&quot; Traditional economic analysis has become increasingly successful at recognising unpaid work, care work, and domestic labour as productive uses of time. Yet many activities that sustain social life continue to be classified as<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002972"> leisure</a> or personal choice, even when they involve strong social obligations and generate important social returns.

Perhaps this is because economics has long been better at measuring what can be bought than what must be sustained. By paying attention to how people invest their time, we begin to see a richer picture of how societies function. Social status is not built solely through consumption. It is also quietly produced through everyday acts of participation, reciprocity, and belonging.

Looking at status through the lens of time also reveals another important dimension: who bears the responsibility of producing it?

Status-producing activities are often imagined as gender-neutral. After all, everyone attends weddings, participates in festivals, maintains family ties or engages in community life. Yet the time devoted to these activities is far from evenly distributed. Data from <a href="https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2106113&amp;reg=48&amp;lang=2">India&#39;s 2024 Time Use Survey</a>, shows that once we account for the less visible forms of status production, such as childcare and unpaid domestic work that sustain a household&#39;s social position over time, women spend, on average, nearly 51 minutes more each day on status-producing activities than men.

This finding invites us to rethink a familiar question in economics: why do women continue to spend less time in paid employment than men, even as educational attainment has improved? One explanation has long pointed to <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668282?seq=1">status considerations</a> within households. Looking at time use adds another layer to this discussion. It suggests that status is not simply an abstract preference shaping decisions; it also requires labour. Much of that labour is carried out through the everyday work of maintaining families, relationships, and communities.

Recognising this labour also changes how we think about inequality. The capacity to build and sustain social status is not determined only by income or education, but also by the time people are able or expected to invest. Maybe this is where the conversation on status needs to move next. If economics has taught us to ask what people spend their money on, it may also be time to ask what people spend their time on. In those everyday choices, and in the constraints that shape them, lies another story about how status is created, maintained, and reproduced across generations.

When Time Becomes Social Capital 

The FIFA World Cup becomes not only a football competition but also an international celebration every four years. All over the world, millions of fans stay awake at unusual times, gather at caf&eacute;s, and flood social networks with their forecasts, joys, and disappointments.

India is also a participant of this festival.

From busy showings in major cities to discussions during night hours on whether Argentina, Brazil, or France will win the cup, Indians follow the World Cup with amazing interest. But while celebrating this event, one question keeps appearing every four years:

&quot;Why is<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce95gvpn535o"> India,</a> a nation of over 1.4 billion people and millions of football fans, unable to participate in the most important football event?&quot;

There are some interesting statistics here.

India is one of the <a href="https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/fifa-world-cup-reaches-over-100-million-viewers-in-india/">largest media</a> markets for the FIFA World Cup. Hundreds of millions of fans are watching the 2026 World Cup in India through TV and streaming services.

But when it comes to performance on the field, the scenario is completely opposite. The Indian team has never participated in the FIFA World Cup. On the contrary, countries like Japan, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Iran have been taking part in the tournament regularly, whereas India is an outsider to the same.

This is often attributed to cricket.

<a href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/more-sports/others/indian-sports-economy-crosses-2-billion-mark-cricket-accounts-for-89/articleshow/129753506.cms">Cricket</a> definitely is dominant in Indian sport in terms of funding, sponsorship, infrastructure, and media coverage. But to attribute this failure only to cricket would be oversimplification.&nbsp;

Even countries that have lesser number of people and less financial capacity have succeeded in becoming football-playing nations. Croatia, having fewer people than several cities of India, reached the finals of the World Cup in 2018 and semi-finals in 2022. Likewise, Morocco became the first African nation to reach a semi-final in the World Cup in 2022. This was not achieved in one day. It took decades of hard work to reach there.

A perfect example of such an event is the current year&rsquo;s World Cup, which saw <a href="https://www.espn.in/football/story/_/id/49265781/cape-verde-incredible-world-cup-run-captured-hearts-earned-respect">Cabo Verde </a>come up with something spectacular. The nation is home to less than half a million people compared to most Indian cities and towns. However, Cabo Verde is among the success stories from the ongoing competition. This team had never qualified to play in any World Cup prior to now, but in their debut tournament, they went unbeaten in the group stage by drawing against football powerhouses like Spain, and giving two-time World Cup champions Uruguay a run for their money. Not even defending champions like Argentina could easily beat them in the knockout stage of the competition when they took the match into extra time before losing 3-2.&nbsp;

This is where India has traditionally fallen short.

For a long time, football in India lacked a robust youth base. There were few opportunities for young players to get quality coaching, compete in leagues, and get professional training. The transition from playing football at the school level to the professional level was vague.

Fortunately, things are starting to change now.

The introduction of the <a href="https://www.the-aiff.com/competitions/isl">Indian Super League</a> in 2014 has helped put the spotlight on Indian football. There have been more football academies, more participation of children in football at school levels, and better training for young players from an earlier age. This may not yield results in World Cup qualification efforts soon, but the development of football takes time. Japan spent decades developing itself into a football power after starting the J-League in the early 1990s. Currently, it is one of the most successful Asian countries in football and regularly qualifies for the World Cup.

It looks like India can expect to follow the same path.

However, some positive signs can be seen. Kerala, West Bengal, Goa, and several northeastern states still contribute talented players as well as devoted fans. The establishment of domestic leagues as well as local tournaments creates the atmosphere of football culture gradually.

It should be noted that there is an interesting facet of India&#39;s attitude to the World Cup which frequently remains unnoticed. Even though India does not have its national team participating in the tournament, people of Indian origins appear to be represented in the World Cup.

One of the most remarkable stories from the current World Cup involves <a href="https://www.brut.media/in/articles/sports/football/who-is-tahsin-mohammed-jamshid-the-19-year-old-with-kerala-roots-in-qatar-s-world-cup-squad">Tahsin Mohammed </a>Jamshid who represents the Qatar national team and whose roots originate from Kerala. Born and brought up in Doha, the son of Indian immigrants from Kannur, Tahsin comes from a football-loving family. His father, Jamshid, used to be a football player representing Calicut University before moving to Qatar. Many years later, his son made it to the top league in football. It was an emotionally significant event for many fans in Kerala.

It is not just Tahsin. The players from India who have participated in the World Cup include people playing for teams like New Zealand, Australia, and DR Congo. Such stories reflect the fact that talent from India associated with football is indeed playing at the highest levels already, although there is a need for creating an environment for nurturing such talent in India.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Emotional ties between India and football have been exemplified very well by the visit of <a href="https://www.thehindu.com/sport/football/india-a-passionate-football-nation-honour-to-return-messi/article70117139.ece">Lionel Messi</a> to India in 2025. Thousands of fans flocked from Mumbai to Kolkata and many other places in India during the trip taken by Messi just to meet him. This reflects the reality that while statistics might show otherwise, India is a country of football lovers who live and breathe the game. It is hard to think of another nation where fans cheer for their favorite team even though they are from a different part of the world.

However, perhaps the greatest transformation has occurred psychologically.

Where previous generations would be supporting their football by backing a foreign team every four years as neutral supporters of the tournament, today&rsquo;s young footballers dream of playing for India in the World Cup.&nbsp;

This dream counts.&nbsp;

India qualifying for the FIFA World Cup is unlikely to happen within one generation of players or even one successful league season. It requires investment, good coaching, proper infrastructure, and patience on the part of all stakeholders.&nbsp;

Nevertheless, for the first time in many years, the discussion has moved from &ldquo;Will India ever qualify?&rdquo; to &ldquo;When will India qualify?&rdquo;

As another World Cup fires up the passion of millions of Indians, it is evident that India celebrates other people&#39;s goals, other people&rsquo;s victories, and other people&rsquo;s trophies.

The day will come soon enough when India might stop being a spectator at football&#39;s biggest spectacle.

On that day, it will be much more than a sporting achievement. It will be a fulfillment of a dream cherished by an entire nation.

India and the FIFA World Cup: A Story of Passion Without Participation 

The country felt immense pride when India won its third T-20 world cup recently, there might be an argument like why a country having so much problem should care about the sports. The fact of the matter about the sports is that they are one of the matters which critically unites people across the country together without any difference. As sports are extended habits of human society which shapes people&rsquo;s cognitive thinking and encourages them to engage in social conversation.&nbsp;

As sports have many positive effects India should make use of it. The Olympics of 2036 is very <a href="https://gamesbids.com/eng/summer-olympic-bids/why-indias-strong-push-to-host-the-2036-olympics-and-suggesting-new-sports-like-yoga-and-kabaddi-is-the-wrong-approach-in-the-iocs-new-bidding-world/">crucial</a> for a developing country like India to host. As the 2030s are becoming the decade for Asian countries in the field of development of sports like India is hosting commonwealth games in 2030 and 2031 Men&rsquo;s cricket world cup along with Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia is hosting 2034 Fifa world cup then this would be the 2036 Olympics of India.&nbsp;

Why to organise the Olympics 2036 ?&nbsp;

Critics point to India&#39;s development gaps, air quality, and infrastructure shortfalls as reasons to avoid an <a href="https://www.thequint.com/climate-change/indias-bid-to-host-olympics-2036-air-pollution-might-be-a-roadblock">Olympic bid</a>. But these gaps are also the argument for bidding: an Olympic deadline creates political and financial pressure to fast-track transport, housing, and environmental projects that might otherwise stall for decades. The risk is real, Olympic hosting has a history of cost overruns and underused venues, but if infrastructure spending is planned with post-Games use in mind, the Games can function as a forcing mechanism for development India already needs, not just a two-week spectacle.&nbsp;

India is not performing well in the Olympics, criticising the infrastructure of the country and so on. When Neeraj Chopra got a gold medal, people took immense pride saying India got a medal. Yes ! The medals will improve when countries have capacity to improve, the hosting of the Olympics 2036 will give a way for that. The classical example would be <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359888138_The_Impact_of_the_2008_Beijing_Olympic_Games_on_China_and_the_Olympic_Movement_The_Legacy">China</a> as before the 2008 Beijing Olympics the number of athletes who participated from China increased three times than earlier one. That also changes the medals winning ratio among athletes. The people who are demoting sports as a secondary matter have to understand that for some it provides livelihood, for the understanding of that one who thinks why there are no or less medals for India &lsquo;the medals will increase&rsquo; when the athletes who are participating for the country increase.

&nbsp;

The Olympics are one of the important aspects which shape the <a href="https://time.com/7371910/the-olympics-diplomatic-power/">foreign policy</a> of the country, the people have to understand the influence of countries&#39; interaction with each other. It shapes the connections of people to people from different nationalities, which can strengthen the ties between countries. The argument can be made with India&rsquo;s past of having international summits like the AI summit that happened recently highlighting the problems, externalities can be possible for a diverse country like India but the fear of past events. There is no denial for the argument that India has to improve its infrastructure but that shouldn&rsquo;t affect the nation&rsquo;s decision on future events. Externalities and gaps should not stop India from developing its infrastructure and fulfilling the gaps for the event which will happen after ten years.&nbsp;

There has been a significant increase in the sports participation of Indian youth in many sports by the games like &lsquo;Khelo India&rsquo; which also provides chances for tribals as &lsquo;Khelo India tribals&rsquo; to engage in the same ladder as non-tribals. It increases the connection between the people across the country even for the people who are not connected. It shows that India has the capabilities to host sports events, in the ten year future the gaps can be filled. The country which has diverse populations, sports and physical activities will connect and unites the people in the same banner. What is greater than the feeling of representing the country in an international event? When the person wins, it means the country wins.

India’s Olympic Dream: Building Towards 2036

As long as there has been AI there is one question that keeps on arising: Can Ai replace graphic <a href="https://www.coursera.org/articles/will-ai-replace-graphic-designers">designers</a>? Recently, I listened to multiple podcasts featuring graphic designers, creative directors and tech leaders. Every single one of them says the same thing &ndash; Ai is not replacing graphic designers. Rather, ai is becoming a very useful tool which makes designers work more <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024160689">effectively</a> and efficiently.

Major tech companies even use ai as a helper not replacement when it comes to the design process. Many of the leaders use Ai as a tool for accelerating assets production, image generation, layouts, <a href="https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/07/28/harnessing-ai-for-pitch-decks-a-guide-to-ai-generated-presentations/">pitch decks</a>, client mock-up presentations. Since the importance of design is greatly determined by people who create, the most popular strategies revolve around empowering the designer rather than firing him or her. Hence, design value is now shifting beyond the mere production of pixels. The true value of design consists of judgement, <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391738337_Survey_of_Cultural_Awareness_in_Language_Models_Text_and_Beyond">cultural awareness</a>, strategy and emotion.These are deeply human skills Ai still cannot fully match.

Design is often believed to consist of colour and typography selection. The truth is that the role of designers is to solve business problems. <a href="https://www.designweek.co.uk/graphic-design-among-most-at-risk-jobs-from-ai-report/">Designers</a> should consider all factors to make sure their projects meet brand guidelines, the appropriate target audience and solve the issue that a business faces. AI will produce good visuals but it won&#39;t know how to read clients&#39; expectations, corporate culture, psychological needs of customers or build an emotional narrative.

How I use AI every day!

I use AI technologies such as ChatGPT, Claude &amp; Gemini almost every day. They enable me to generate content, proofread texts, check facts, extract text from different documents, make summaries and brainstorm ideas. All these activities used to require a lot of my time before. AI performs the vast majority of routine tasks, allowing me to concentrate on visual communication and design itself.

One project which used to take hours is now completed significantly faster. In many cases, AI has helped me to decrease my production time almost by half. This does not imply any loss of quality. This just means that I have more time for creativity and strategic work with clients. Many premium AI subscriptions now cost almost the same as a designer hourly rate. This shows that AI is becoming a source of professional productivity, not a replacement for creative people. Designers who learn to use Ai well will produce better work in less time. 
 
Print media still depends on designers 
AI is getting stronger in digital design, but print media still needs technical skills. Designers must prepare files for brochures, packaging banners, newspapers, business cards, hoarding and many other print formats. Software like Adobe Creative Suite and CorelDRAW still lead professional print production because print needs a level of precision that Ai cannot fully handle yet.

Print has a legacy that spans a period of over one thousand years starting from woodblock printing in China to the invention of the printing press in India. Today, even when print jobs are created, there are numerous technical considerations in printing. AI assists designers in identifying mistakes even before they are printed; thus, minimizing errors, saving paper and lowering costs.

The future is for the designer using AI

AI is <a href="https://www.creativeboom.com/news/its-official-ai-is-coming-for-your-graphic-design-job/">revolutionizing</a> the design industry but is not replacing designers. The designer&rsquo;s job is evolving from mere creative visualization to problem-solving, branding and smart creative thinking. This change in job roles is well-supported by research conducted on the topic; for example, the World Economic Forum&#39;s Future of Jobs Report 2025 showed that even as demand for traditional execution-oriented design jobs is falling, the need for UI/UX design and creative analysis is increasing, a uniquely human skill that Ai fails to perform.

Ai is the assistant. The designer is still the decision maker

Blogs

OPINION

No Questions about Hyderabad